12 Angry Jurors

This adaption of the well-known Twelve Angry Men has been brought to life at Sandgate Theatre using a very simple setting, as expected, with the audience semi in the round to bring them closer to the action. Never having served on any jury panel, I found this almost as much a learning exercise as an evening of entertainment. The twelve jurors have to determine if the person charged was guilty of murder. The audience members became very aware of the pressure on each member of the panel as it would in real life. They too heard all the evidence and must surely have also had to decide on guilt or not. This was a very diverse group of panellists with the full range of ages with a good blend of the two genders.

Not only did Catherine Radbourne very successfully direct the play but  she had to play the role of Juror 12. As the action took place with the cast sitting at a large table, it was essential for strong performances vocally and emotionally.  This was achieved and maintained excellently throughout the entire performance.  The result was that the belief of guilt or innocence of the person charged changed back and forth. Congratulations to all cast members for such a strong team performance. However, mention must be made of Nicky Whichelow, who was the spoke in the wheel of calm logical discussion.  Her acting as Juror 3 was the crux at the centre of all the debate. Her performance was very good indeed.

After seeing this production, I do not want to ever be on a jury panel. The Sandgate Theatre is staging one of their best efforts for some time but was the verdict guilty or not guilty. Go to judge for yourself. Great.

William Davies